|
|
|
上海市检察院对于控告人的控告事实装疯卖傻
真是腐败到家了！
2011年7月26日，控告人邮寄了一封挂号信给上海市检察院举报中心，其中有内容为《控告上海市长宁区公安分局分局长（吴永志、周正）非法拘禁罪和滥用职权罪》的书面控告材料。信中附事实依据：北京市公安局提供的无“扰乱”违法事实《政府信息不存在告知书》。
长宁区公安分局多次无事实、无依据，以“扰乱公共场所秩序”违法的罪名，将控告人重罚拘留包括上酷刑和体罚等。【请参阅1）《控告上海市公安局长宁分局分局长吴永志、周正）非法拘禁罪和滥用职权罪》；2）泣血控告上海市长宁区公安分局干警残暴的不法行径）】。
一个多月过去了，上海市检察院无音讯。
2011年8月12日，控告人拿着挂号信的回执，找到上海市检察院举报中心信访接待室官员，戴眼镜的老接待员就这封挂号信，口头答复控告人称：上海市长宁区公安分局分局长（吴永志、周正）实施的是组织行为不构成非法拘禁罪，所以：1）检察院不予立案 ；2）不给予书面答复。这个问题就到此结束了！
控告人表示异议称：即使非法拘禁罪名不成立，滥用职权罪和虐待被监管人员罪名应该可以成立的！该检察员不予理睬，控告人要求其按照信访条例出具书面答复意见，他示意保安将控告人拉出信访接待场所。
2011年8月24日，控告人再次走访上海市检察院举报中心信访接待室，要求信访接待官员给予书面答复，该接待官员告知：解释，不符合非法拘禁罪主体身份，不符合受理条件，不受理。自然也就没有书面意见！
控告人两次走访市检察院，信访窗口接待员两次口头答复控告人不予立案，两次拒不出具“不予立案”书面答复意见书！
控告人认为，上海市检察院信访窗口接待人员既然有勇气说，就应该有勇气出具书面答复意见书，控告人不知其口头告知是个人行为，还是组织行为？国有国法，家有家规，任何人都不得超越！控告人请求有关领导调查核实后，给控告人一个说法！
上海市检察院检察官如此公然包庇和纵容地方公安局和法院违法，不依法立案或书面答复，还叫保安当庭非礼，如此蛮不讲理，真是腐败到家了！
（联系地址：上海市长宁区昭化路90号101室，邮编：200050）
控告人：尹慧敏
2011年8月31日
Shanghai Municipal Procuratorate against the accusation against him for the fact that dumb
Really corrupt home!
July 26, 2011, complainant mailed a registered letter to the Shanghai Municipal Procuratorate reporting center, which reads "against sub-Changning District, Shanghai Public Security Bureau Secretary (Wu Yongzhi, Zhou Zheng) illegal detention and abuse of powercrime, "written complaint materials.The letter attached to the factual basis: Beijing Public Security Bureau provided no "disrupt" the illegal facts "to government information does not exist this book."
Changning District Public Security Bureau several times no facts, no basis, in order to "disrupt public places order" illegal charges, the accused person subject to heavy penalties on torture and detention, including corporal punishment.[See 1) "Public Security Bureau of Shanghai Changning Branch points against the Secretary Wu Yongzhi, Zhou Zheng) the crime of illegal detention and abuse of power"; 2) Tears of Blood against Changning District, Shanghai Public Security Bureau police officers brutal criminal acts)].
More than a month later, the Shanghai Procuratorate no audio.
August 12, 2011, an accused person holding a registered letter receipt, to find the center of Shanghai's Procuratorate reported Petition reception officers, with glasses on to this old receptionist registered mail, verbal responses against person: Shanghai Changning District Public Security SubBoard sub-Secretary (Wu Yongzhi, Zhou Zheng) the implementation of the organization did not constitute the crime of illegal detention, so 1) Prosecutions not to file 2) does not give a written reply.The problem is this is over!
Complainant said that objection: even if not guilty of illegal detention, abuse and mistreatment of regulators crime charges should be set up!The inspectors ignored, requiring an accused person in accordance with regulations issued by the letters written replies to comments, he hands out the security of people receiving letters and visits will be charged place.
August 24, 2011, complainant again visited the Shanghai Municipal Procuratorate reported Petition reception center, requiring officials to give a written reply to letters received, officials told the reception: to explain, does not meet the main identity of the crime of illegal detention, does not meet the acceptance criteria, will not be accepted.Naturally there is no written comments!
Accused person twice visited the city's Procuratorate, the petition window receptionist two oral reply to an accused person not on file, twice refused to issue a "no filing" a written reply submissions!
Accused person that the petition window receptionist's Procuratorate of Shanghai since the courage to say, they should have the courage to issue a written reply submissions, a verbal complaint is people do not know their personal behavior, or organizational behavior?State laws and family rules, no person shall exceed!Complainant requested the leader after investigation and verification, to the complainant a statement!
Shanghai Municipal Procuratorate, prosecutors so flagrantly and connivance of the local Public Security Bureau and cover up illegal courts, not by law or filing a written answer, also called security court of indecent assault, so unreasonable, really corrupt home!
(Address: 90 Zhaohua Road, Changning District, Shanghai, Room 101, Postal Code: 200050)
Accused person: Yin Huimin
[ 本帖最后由 ningsibuqu 于 2011-11-23 09:34 编辑 ] |
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2011-8-13 12:10:01
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡