|
|
刘蔚：语文/英语/文学课应该怎么讲？—六年高考1.56
公友/民主人士/觉醒人士/普通百姓 刘蔚 2014年7月17日
Wei Liu Memoir 1.56: How Should We Teach Chinese/English/Literature?
Human Rights Worker/Democratic People/Awakened People/Common People
Wei Liu July 17, 2014
继续谈余杰的作品。都用做法来写，写出来象说明文，或者烹饪书，不象文学作品。安排线索本来就难。线索是什么？线索是能使读者长时间感兴趣的事物。在几百字的短篇作品里是难以安排线索的，也没有必要。譬如说文中的酱鸭，我觉得就难以安排线索。如果有人来个酱鸭的做法有些象腊肉，那会不会吃了对人健康有害？这是读者关心的事情，但是吃一只鸭子也看不出来。就是吃很多鸭子也难以看出来。科学/西方科学远没有那么发达。这样的线索不行。或者酱鸭硬，那会不会把人的牙齿害了？读者关心，但正常心智的人不会冒把自己牙齿害了的风险去吃一个菜品。这样的线索也不行。或者是否有钱买酱鸭？那是读者关心的，但这样线索本身与酱鸭无关。这样的线索也不行。
We continue talking about Yu Jie’s works. If all kinds of ducks are using the cuisine to describe, it will be like exposition or a cuisine book, not like literature. To arrange a thread into the work is difficult. What is a thread? A thread is the thing that keeps the readers interested for long time. It is hard to arrange a thread in several-hundred-word works, and it is not necessary. For instance, it will be hard to arrange a thread in the works on the Marinated Duck. If a writer describes that the cuisine of it is like that of smoked bacon, then the reader may be interested in whether it is unhealthy to eat it, but it is impossible to show that by eating one duck. Even after one eating many ducks, it is still hard to see so. Science or western Science is far from being that advanced. Such thread cannot work. Or a writer may write that the duck feels so hard, then the reader may feel interested in whether it may break one’s tooth. But people with normal mind would not risk their teeth on eating a dish. Such thread cannot work either. Or a writer may write whether one has the money for the duck? The reader would be interested in it, but this thread has nothing to do with the duck itself. Such thread cannot work either.
第二种鸭麻鸭的线索，麻鸭是否需要用刀切，应该说那是碰巧有这样一个线索，又被余杰发现，运用了。第三种鸭百草炖老鸭与第一种鸭酱鸭一样，难以安排什么线索。
The thread for the second kind of duck Brown Duck, which is whether it needs to be cut by knife, is discovered and used by Yu Jie. The third kind of duck Old Duck Stewed by Herbs is the same as the first kind of duck the Marinated Duck, hard to arrange any kind of thread.
再有就是余杰的文字，不限于这篇，并不刻意形成什么句式。有的作品多用长句，有的作品多用短句。他文字的语法/句式与他的写作哲学是一致的，那就是如实正面地描述生活，生活80%是困苦，那就是80%是困苦，不是90%，也不是70%，在这点上倒是与我刘蔚一样。我不会写什么[我们屁民]，我只会写[我们民众]，[人人平等]。
Another thing is the language in Yu Jie’s works, which does not confine to this article. His language does not intend for certain syntax, like the long sentences or the short sentences. His language represents his philosophy, which is to truthfully describe life. If 80% of life is misery, then 80% of his words will be on misery, not 90% or 70%, which is the same as me, Wei Liu. I would not write something like “we people looking like fart”; I would only write “we people” or “all people are equal.”
各位，读书就应该这样读。譬如说，你读了余杰“绍兴的鸭”，如果能有我上面类似的感受，那么你是读透彻了。如果你读完一篇文章，最多有一两句话的感受，那你也就是在认中国字，在认英语，认法语，认日语，谈不上学习，谈不上精神上的享受。
People, the book should be read this way. For instance, after you read Yu Jie’s “Shaoxing Duck”, and you can have the above feeling, then you understand it thoroughly. If after reading an article, your feeling is only one or two sentences, then you are just recognize the words, recognizing English words, French words or Japanese words, which has nothing to with study or knowledge, not to mention to gain happiness from it.
1949年到现在2014年，中国的语文，英文从小学到博士都应该这么讲，就是讲文字本身的要素，而不是中共学校语文，英文的不是为掠夺全民土地，全民福利的抢人制度叫好，就是讲国民党，外国糟糕。难道一部作品歌颂共产党就是好作品了？难道一部作品否定共产党就是坏作品了？可以说中国的语文课只有10%的时间花在应该讲的要素上，剩下90%以上的时间都在给学生灌输错误的思想，所谓中心思想式/奴才式教育。
The school in China from 1949 to now 2014 from elementary school to doctor class should teach Chinese and English this way, to elaborate on the language itself, but in the school controlled by the Communist, it elaborates either on the Communist system that robs all people of the land, of the welfare is good, or their opponents, the foreign countries is bad. Probably only 10% of the class is on the elements that should be taught and 90% of the class or time or homework is on the wrong ideas, the central idea/slavery education.
“六年高考1.56：语文/英语/文学课应该怎么讲?”完
《走过六年高考岁月》第1本书：《从出生到小学毕业》待续
The end of “Wei Liu Memoir/Six Years Examination 1.56: How Should We Teach
Chinese/English/Literature?”
Walking Through Six Years Examination/Wei Liu Memoir Book One From Birth to
the Graduation of Elementary School to be continued
刘蔚：伟大的中国全民大革命
公友/民主人士/觉醒人士/普通百姓 刘蔚 2014年6月1日
Wei Liu: The Great All People Revolution in China June 2014
Human Rights Worker/Democratic People/Awakened People/Common People
Wei Liu June 1, 2014
如果你还想你或你亲友每人拿回土地，住房，医疗，拿回包括公民税率，政府各方面开支等社会事务的表决权这些民主人权，你最好读完这篇长文。你可以从Google translate/谷歌翻译听文章的朗读。你可告诉你外国朋友/老师我写的英文。他们可以在google上用“Wei Liu Revolution” or “Wei Liu Exam”搜寻出我的文字。更多文章见我的海外博讯boxun网站的博客，加上前后的www, com 我名字在首页底部的作者群中。从2007年到2014年2月，我博客的显示点击量已达300万，而按博讯说的各博客的实际点击量是显示点击量的10倍以上，那我博客的实际点击量到2014年2月已达3000万。我们的文字是对中国民众说的，是我们认为真实的情况，欢迎各位，各媒体.转载，传播。一个人给5个以上人讲我们《伟大的中国全民大革命》中的1项国际公约，2项活动主张，4项基本人权，8项优秀活动，及本县/市政权楼等几个地址，民众兵器弹弓枪等起义事宜，壮大进步力量，救自己，救别人，救中国。
If you want you or your friends in this life to get back the human rights of half an acre land, welfares of housing, medical care, the voting rights on the tax rate and the government budget, you’d better read through this long essay. Google translate can read text aloud for you. If you have foreign friends/teachers, you may tell them to read the English part of my essay. They can google me out by “Wei Liu Revolution” or “Wei Liu Exam”. More articles of mine can be seen in my blog at “boxun”, with “www” in the front and “com” in the back, my name Wei Liu/刘蔚 is at the bottom of the homepage. From 2007 to 2014, my blog has 3 million displayed visits, and the website says that the actual visits is 10 times as the displayed visits. Then the actual visits of my blog is 30 million. What we say here we hold is true and is for 1.3 billion Chinese people. Every one is welcomed to publish, to spread our words, one person tells 5 or more persons, about the 1 international convention, the 2 uprising opinions, the 4 fundamental human rights, the 8 excellent activities, the couple of addresses of the Communist regime buildings in the local county, the uprising elements like the slingshot of people’s weapon. Anyway, we expand the democratic strength to save ourselves, our friends and our country.
1949年中共在中国掌权以来，掠夺全民土地，掠夺全民住房，食品，教育，医疗四项生存福利，然后把全民抛进战争，大跃进，文革，高考，无限物质，无限污染等一个又一个的角斗场里。毛泽东时代就害死了8千万中国人，包括1959年到1962年三年饥荒饿死的4千万人。2000年以来中国每年非正常死亡300万人以上，包括在打斗中死亡的100万人，200万人进行自杀。2010年代中国满18岁的10亿中国人的平均收入不过1年1万元人民币，工作30年，一生收入不过30万元人民币。而普通一套住房达到160万元，一人一生的食品费用达70万元，教育费用至少10万元，医疗费用至少10万元。一人一生的住房，食品，教育，医疗全部四项生存的费用在中共治下2010年代达160+70+10+10=250万元人民币。250万/30万>8。就是说普通百姓干8辈子也挣不到1辈子所需的住房等四项生存。同时，中国的环境崩溃了。民国时，北京周围100公里有80多条河流，地下水位在2米左右；2000年起看不到1条河流了，地下水位在约40米，70%以上的水面严重污染。1980年代以前，中国只有重庆，武汉，南京三大火炉，2000年起，夏天全国都成了火炉。冬天的雾霾里，3米外认不出熟人。全国25%的土壤重金属含量超标，种出来的农产品有毒。从1949年到2010年代中国的状况用八个字来形容就是“民不聊生，环境崩溃”。
Abstract: Since 1949 the Communist Party came into power in China, it has been robbing all people of the land, of the welfare of housing, food, education and medical care. Mao Zedong’s age has caused 80 million Chinese people to death, including 40 million starved to death between 1959 and 1962. Since 2000, every year there are 3.2 million people died abnormally, including 1 million in fighting and 2 million committing suicide. In the 2010s, on average in China, one can make about 50,000 U. S. dollars in one’s life, but the expenses for the 4 livings of housing, food, education and medical care are about 420,000 U. S. dollars, which means even one works for 8 lifetimes, one cannot make a living in China for 1 lifetime. Meanwhile, China’s environment sees debacles. Before 1949, there were 80-odd rivers within 70 miles of Beijing, but since 2000, there is not a single river visible. Over 70% of the water surface in China sees heavy pollution. From 1949 to 2010s, China’s situation can be described as “hard to survive and environment debacle.
中国历代民众每人有老天给他生存的上万平方米的土地，住房，食品，教育，医疗等四项生存无忧。唐诗宋词的作者都是普通的农人，不愿出山当副统帅的诸葛亮及其好友都是普通的农人。可见，拥抱西方马列极权思想的共产党带给中国的不是进步，而是倒退。革命是重大进步，反革命是重大退步。中共政权及其几万名县级（含）以上高官才是中国唯一的反革命，反动派，汉奸。13亿人的所有困苦都是这个掠夺民众的政权害的。在民不聊生的同时，中共高官日进斗金。2006年起，中国0.4%的人占有中国70%的财富，3000名高干子弟占有2万亿元人民币的财富，平均每人6.7亿元。同时，中共制定法律的人大代表并非本地居民一人一票选举产生，如北京市的人大代表就不是北京2千万居民一人一票选举产生，制定的法律也没有经过民众一人一票的表决。显然，中共的整个法律体系毫无民意，因此是完全非法的。2000年以来中国社会的主要矛盾就是掠夺全民的几万名中共县级（含）以上高官同被他们掠夺/压榨的13亿人之间的矛盾。有人说等待中国变好。我们看到中国的状况是越来越糟。中国历代民众安居乐业，还吟诗作画，创造出举世公认的华夏文明；1980年代，部分城市人有住房，医疗的报酬，全国有约10%的人能靠自己解决住房等全部四项生存；1990年代以来，全国能靠自己解决全部四项生存的人不到2%。每个人赖以生存的环境，如上所述，也是越来越糟。一个人因为工作而获得的住房，医疗叫报酬，不叫福利。一个人不因为工作，因为是一个人而获得的住房，医疗才叫福利。从单位领取的叫报酬，从政府领取的叫福利。1949年以来中国人是没有任何福利的。
Abstract: In the dynasties in China, every one has 2 acres of land given by God for one to live, and leads a life free of material worries and Chinese people have made well-known civilization in the world including literature and architecture. The Communist Party embracing Marxism from the west, bringing to China not progress, but regress. It is the only anti-revolutionary, reactionary and Chinese traitor. Since 2006, 0.4% of People in China has 70% of the wealth there. 3,000 Communist high officials’ relatives have about 0.33 trillion U. S. dollars of wealth and on average one has about 100 million U. S. dollars. Meanwhile, the so-called People’s Representatives in China are not voted by local people with one person one ballot. For instance, Beijing People’s Representatives are not voted by the 20 million Beijing residents with one person one ballot. The major social contradiction in China is the tens of thousands of the Communist high officials county level or above and the 1.3 billion common Chinese people who are being robbed. The material a person gets from the company is called compensation; the material one gets from the government is called welfare. Since 1949, Chinese people do not have any welfare.
13亿人什么时候才能有自己的住房，医疗？什么时候才能不受高温，污染之害？什么时候才能快乐多过痛苦？实现土地权，福利权，表决权，现金权四项基本人权全民一人一份的民主公平的新中国，才能使13亿人脱离苦海，享有快乐。对于这四项基本人权，我们愿意13亿人一人一票进行表决，并估计赞成票会超过反对票，所以我们才讲出来。四项基本人权如下。
When can 1.3 billion Chinese people have our own house, our own medical care? When can we Chinese people free from the 100 degrees heat waves and the heavy pollution? When can we have enough time for chess, mahjong, classics books and other good things that give happiness to ourselves and other people? The solution is to build up a fair, democratic new world, including a fair, democratic new China. Any human is entitled to the 4 Fundamental Human Rights including the land right, the welfare right, the decision-making right and the cash right. For the 4 Fundamental Human Rights, we are willing to have a universal vote and reckon that the pros will be more than the cons. So we bring them forward in the following.
1． 土地权：满18岁的每位成年人拥有老天给他生存的2000平方米的土地去生存，包括建房，种地，死后不遗传，交还民选政府由后来满18岁的人领取，一人一份。
1. The Land Right: Every person reaching 18 years old is entitled to have about
half an acre of land given by God for him/her to live, which let any person
build their house and plant crops for food. The land does not pass down to
one’s children when one dies, but return to the people-elected government
for other people to have who reaching 18 years old later. One person, one
portion.
2． 福利权：占用了老天给民众生存的土地的政府有责任给每人提供住房，食品，教育，医疗四项生存福利，一人一份。如果公民自己已解决，则不再从政府领取。
2. The Welfare Right: Any government that has used the land given by God for people to live has the responsibility to give every person the 4 living welfares of housing, food, education and medical care, one person, one portion. If one has solved it by oneself, then one does not get that kind of welfare from the government any more.
3. 表决权：法律，政策，如企业税率，政府预算分配比例，全国应有多少万军队，学生一天上多少节课，应由民众一人一票表决，决定是否实行。不要再谈什么社会主义，资本主义，左派，右派，人类只该有一个主义/派别，就是全民一人一票决定国家的法律，政策。不愿意13亿民众有决定权的人绝不会是真正的爱国者。实践本身不会说话，经历了实践的民众一人一票的表决才是检验真理的唯一标准。
3. The Decision-Making Right: All the laws and policies like the tax rate, the government budget, how many divisions the armed force should have, how many classes the student should have a day, should be all decided by people’s vote, one person, one ballot, to decide whether to enact. Don’t talk about socialism, capitalism, left or right any more. Mankind should have only one doctrine. That is all people decide the law and policy of a country by our universal vote. Anyone who is unwilling to see people be the decision makers cannot be real patriotic. Experience itself cannot talk. The universal vote by people who has experience is the only criterion to decide whether an opinion is truth or fallacy.
4. 现金权：属于民众的现金应该全民一人一份。如一年民选政府收到海内外捐款2600亿元给中国民众，此款就应在13亿人中平分，每人该年应获得2600/13=200元。
4. The Cash Right: The cash that belongs to all people should be divided evenly among all the people, one person, one portion. For instance, if one year the people-elected government receives the total donation of 260 billion dollars inside and outside China for Chinese people, then this amount should be divided evenly among the 1.3 billion Chinese people, and every Chinese that year should have 260/1.3=200 dollars.
实现四项基本人权后，每人每天平均工作/劳动1小时就能解决住房，食品，教育，医疗全部四项物质生存。那时每人可以每天进行12小时阅读，麻将，围棋，象棋，乒乓等任何他/她喜爱干的事情。那些反对我们观点的人恨不得把词典里所有的贬义词都加在我们公友/觉醒人士/普通百姓身上，但他们从来不愿意民众就他们的观点或我们的观点进行一人一票的表决，而我们是从来愿意进行这样的表决的。这样各位就知道谁是图谋私利，谁是服务民众的了。凡是大部分赞成我们四项基本人权观点的人，我们相互称为公友/同志/觉醒人士/民主人士/普通百姓，就象棋友，牌友，书友一样，不需要登记。我们进行的是一场中国民众从没有家园到有家园，从没有民主人权到有民主人权的伟大的中国全民大革命。
Abstract: Once we realize the 4 Fundamental Human Rights, one can solve all the 4 livings of housing, food, education and medical care by working/laboring 1 hour a day on average. All those who largely agree with the 4 Fundamental Human Rights, we may call each other Human Rights Worker, Comrades, Awakened People, Democratic People, or Common People. Just like chess fans, card fans and book fans, we do not need to register. We are doing a grand All-People Revolution in China.
2000年以来，我们普通百姓就两个标准。判断一个人生活好坏的标准是这人能否每天平均工作/劳动1小时就解决住房，食品，教育，医疗全部四项生存。判断我们言行是否该做的标准是设想中国10亿成年人一人一票表决，如果赞成票超过反对票，我们就去做；赞成票低于反对票，我们就不做。中国99%以上的人都不能每天平均工作/劳动1小时就解决住房等全部四项生存，都是受到了严重的政治迫害。许多人讲，中国人都有一部血泪史，就看你承认不承认了。从2013年起，我们的文章都有英汉对照文字，服务民众。这是一块试金石，凡是能够自己写出类似的10行英语的人，通过高考，大学英语四级，考研英语，托福，GRE的可能达到90%以上。
Since 2000, we Common People have 2 criteria. The criterion to see whether one’s life is good is to see whether one can solve all the 4 livings of housing, food, education and welfare by working/laboring 1 hour a day on average. The criterion to decide whether we should do an activity is to imagine if the 1 billion Chinese people vote, whether there are more pros than the cons for the activity. If the pros are more than the cons, we go ahead and do it; if the pros are lower than the cons, we do not do it. Over 99% of Chinese people cannot solve all his/her 4 livings by working 1 hour a day and have suffered from serious political persecution. Many people say that all people in China have a long sad story. The different lies only in whether you acknowledge it or not. Now our writings are in both Chinese and English version. Any one can write 10 lines of English like this should have over 90% of chance to pass the exams like the Entrance Exam to College, the College English Band 4 Test, Graduate School English Test, TOEFL and GRE.
任何物质/财富的产生都会消耗电力等能源，制造垃圾，污染。一个人的生活只需要带厨卫的40平方米的住房，每天1斤食品，清洁空气，清洁的水四项物质。更多的物质如更大住房并不能让人睡得更好，更多食品只是加重人的肠胃负担，也必然带来更多垃圾，污染。我们说民主人权，宗教信仰，象棋，麻将，名著，围棋，乒乓球，羽毛球是人类八项优秀活动，因为它们基本上不消耗物质，不污染环境，不伤害他人，就给自己，给别人带来了快乐。2010年代，中国有约1亿法轮功学员，2亿基督徒含天主教徒，3亿佛教徒，一共6亿信仰人士。就是说中国10亿成年人中，一半以上人是信神的。中国民众应该有宗教信仰自由。
Any material/wealth will consume energy like electricity and produce trash and pollution. One’s living just needs an apartment about 400 square feet, 1 pound of food per day, clean air, clean water, the 4 materials. More materials do not do people good. Larger living place does not let one sleep better and more food just increases the burden of one’s digesting system. We believe that democracy/human rights, religion/faith, chess, mahjong, masterpieces, go, ping pang, badminton are the 8 excellent activities of mankind, for they almost do not consume material, do not bring conflict or pollution, and bring happiness to people. In the 2010s, there are about 100 million Falun Gong believers, 200 million Christians including Catholic, 300 million Buddhists in China, altogether 600 million believers in China. Chinese people should have the religious freedom, though the Communist regime has been persecuting the believers.
不要指望你，我的任何言行能改变本市，乃至全国的状况，如果那样指望，我们什么事情也不能做了。我们每天进行吃饭，睡觉，下棋，看书，民主人权等多种活动，并不指望任何活动改变社会的状况。不会认为我睡一觉会使本县/市居民休息得更好，否则我不睡觉了。凭什么到了民主人权活动，我们就必须改变当地的状况才去做？我们认为能改变当地状况，才该去做的观点，又是中共媒体对民众的误导了。中共还用政治，造谣等语汇误导，威胁民众。政治就是社会财富的分配，民众当然要关注。造谣是明知这样，有意说成别样。如中共明明知道抗战23场战役中22场是国军打的，还说中共是抗战的主力军，这就是造谣。而一个人如果真心那样认为，即使被证明错误，也不是造谣。就是学生也不可能要求得100分，那难道学生每天都在造谣？我们的意思是13亿人完全可以发表自己的意见，只要你真心那样认为。
Abstract: Do not expect your or my activity to change the situation of a city or even a country. If one has that kind of expectation, then one cannot do anything. Because anything one does including sleeping cannot change the social situation. One sleeps today does not make people in this city sleep any better. Though the Communist regime has made many labels to intimidate people’s effort for democracy like one cannot talk about politics, the 1.3 billion Chinese people should have the human rights to express themselves.
我们劝13亿人不要再被中共误导走极端。毛泽东的物质/财富越少越好，邓小平的物质越多越好，都是极端，都是错误的。人生的意义绝非这辈子消耗/占有了多少物质/财富，而是对民主人权，文化科学等人类文明作出了多少贡献与努力。杜甫的人生意义是财富是他1万倍的人的1万倍以上。古今中外的历史/民众从来不肯定富豪，肯定的是华盛顿，林肯，梭罗，爱默生，孙中山，蒋介石，遇罗克，林昭，二王，魏京生，余杰，杨佳，孙天勤，邓玉娇，胡耀邦，赵紫阳，伍凡，唐伯桥，高智晟，温家宝，万里，胡佳，贾甲，郭泉，袁红冰，章天亮，辛灏年，叶宁，刘晓波，丁家喜，丁子霖，许志永，八九学生市民，信仰练功团体，基督徒，还有我刘蔚这样没有任何证件，任何职位，2010年代一个月300元人民币的亿万普通民众，因为我们都为中国走向民主人权作出了贡献。
Here we advise Chinese people not to go extremes. Mao Zedong’s “the less materials, the better” and Deng Xiaoping’s “the more materials, the better” are all wrong. No rich people have been valued by history/people. The penniless poet Du Fu’s life value is more than 10,000 times of those whose wealth is 10,000 times of him. The history has valued George Washington, Lincoln, Thoreau, Emerson, Sun Zhongshan, Jiang Jieshi, Yu Luoke, Lin Zhao, Two Wang, Wei Jingsheng, Yu Jie, Yang Jia, Sun Tianqin, Deng Yujiao, Hu Yaobang, Zhao Ziyang, Wu Fan, Tang Boqiao, Gao Zhisheng, Wen Jiabao, Wan Li, Hu Jia, Jia Jia, Guo Quan, Yuan Hongbing, Zhang Tianliang, Xin Haonian, Ye Ning, Liu Xiaobo, Ding Jiaxi, Ding Zilin, Xu Zhiyong, Students and Beijing People of 1989, Falun Gong Believers, Christians, and also 1 billion people like me, Wei Liu, who has no certificate, no position, about 50 U. S. dollars per month in China, because we all have made effort for China’s democracy and human rights.
对于愿意推进中国走向民主人权的人来说，办法多得很，包括在家革命，使用蓝色，游行/步行，集会，罢工，罢课，罢市，呼吁改革，讲真相，九评三退，攻击中共军政机关及人员，武力起义，宣布成立中国民主政府。我老百姓再不行了，哪天到街上高呼，“我宣布成立中国民主政府！”总是可以的。对于无意推进中国走向民主人权的人来说，他们除了讨好中共官员，认贼作父，对其它的没有概念。各种民主人权活动不是相互矛盾，而是相互补充的关系。这里我们呼吁13亿人随时准备够一家人吃一个月的水，粮食，一是防止物价飞涨，譬如元旦，春节物价高时就不购物了，下一个月物价回落了，再买；二是便于参与在家革命，罢工，罢市等民主活动。这里建议各位成立三人左右小组，这样在行动的当时多半不吃亏。只有解放全国人民，才能解放我们自己。
Abstract: There are many ways or activities for democracy, including home revolution, using blue color, walk/demonstration, stop on working, stop on class, stop on market, call for reform, withdrawal from the Communist Party and its associated organizations, attack on the government office and its personnel, military uprising, declaring to form the Democratic Government of China. Here we advise the 1.3 billion people to prepare the food for a family for a month to deal with the price increase at holidays and also for activities like home revolution, stop on work, on market. We also advise people to form 3-people group that way we have more chance to avoid being hurt during an activity. Only when all people in China are liberated, can we liberate ourselves.
2014年5月起习近平当局居然在和平时期，让军警带枪上子弹在各大城市巡逻，民众乘坐地铁等地面交通工具还需要过安检，那不是坐飞机，居然搜查行人的包，人身，你带水，军警要让你喝一口，看是不是爆燃装置。这显然是走向全国军管。这里我们对军警说，不要为难民众，他不是犯罪嫌疑人，你没有理由搜查人家的包。更好的是军警有了子弹就起义，全国军管的事实本身就表明，中共政权在2010年代已经面临了绝大多数人的反对。对于民众来说，军警在街上拿枪持弹本身就是对民众的威胁，侮辱。我普通公民凭什么要在你的枪口下去逛街，购物？对于13亿人来说，可以考虑的是敌进我退。中共当局已经让机枪，冲锋枪是机枪的一种，上街了，已经显示了它是民众的敌人。民众可以采取的一个办法可以是敌进我退，既然你让机枪上街了，我老百姓也就不出来，在家里打麻将，下象棋，拒绝买你中共掌控的各种店的商品。这也就是郭泉提出的在家革命。现在有网络，手机，不出门照样可以与友人联系。这就是罢市，不由商家发起，而由民众发起。这个罢市，在家革命是当局逼出来的。
Abstract: Since May 2014, Xi Jinping, the Party leader, has ordered the military including the police to bear guns patrolling on the street in the big cities. People have to go through the safety inspection even just taking the subway, not the plane. People’s pocket and the bags are searched by the government security, and if you have bottle water, you will be asked to take a drink from it to see whether it is explosive. This is moving toward National Military Administration. The search and the sub-machine guns on street are threat and insult upon people. Why should I go shopping under the muzzle of your guns? Here we advise 1.3 billion Chinese people to consider back up at the advance of the enemy. The Communist regime by putting the machine guns on street has already shown that it is the enemy of people. Then we common people may just stay at home, playing chess, mahjong, and refuse to buy anything from the stores controlled by that regime. This is stop on market, not run by the business people, but by common people. The stop on market or home revolution is caused by the current regime.
任何一个国家出了问题，都必然是民主人权方面的问题。如美国一些人认为房地产税高，全国每年约400亿美金。而美国因为二战历史原因，承担了日本，德国等其盟国的部分常规军力的防御，这本身损害了美国民众的人权。如果美国尊重本国民众的人权，不再承担其盟国的常规军力防御，节省下来的部队，装备的费用，每年就有400亿美金。德国，日本应该造自己的航母等常规武器，而不能再靠美国航母保护其国家。
When there is problem in a country, it will always be that of democracy and human rights. For example, some people in the United States hold that the property tax has been a burden to American people, about 40 billion U. S. dollars per year. Owing to the historical reason in World War II, the United States has undertaken a part of the conventional military defense of its allies like Japan and Germany, which violates the human rights of American people. If U. S. government respects the human rights of American people and does not undertake the conventional military defense of its allies, the expenses saved from U. S. troops and U. S. equipment will be about 40 billion U. S. dollars per year. Germany and Japan should make their own conventional weapons like the carrier and should not rely on the United States’ carrier to protect them any longer.
这里我们对中国13亿人提出两项起义主张，就是首先起义的人有权协调周围的人，首先起义的地方/部队有权协调周围的地方/部队。因为平时你有各种冤屈，想找个人诉说，别人都忙，现在有人起义，那是在从根本上解决你的问题。一旦起义发生，一边是解放区，一边专制区，你当然该参加解放区，如果谁这个时候还听令于专制区，那就是千古罪人。还有一项国际公约，《日内瓦战俘公约》。中共政府在1952年签署了此公约。该公约说不能侮辱战俘人格，如叫其爬在地上，要给战俘提供水，食品。我们的起义军民如果被中共军警捉住，应受该国际公约保护，中共不得打，更不能杀我们的战俘。二王，杨佳都算是起义军，中共杀害了失去了武器的他们，是违反了国际公约。
Abstract: Here we bring up 2 uprising opinions to 1.3 billion Chinese people, which is that the one who do the uprising first has the right to coordinate the people around; the place or the troops who do the uprising first has the right to coordinate the places and the troops around. Because in daily times, you have all kinds of grievances, and other people are too busy to hear your story, and now one starts the uprising that is to solve your problem thoroughly, of course you should join. Once an uprising happens, one side is the liberated zone and the other side is the Communist zone, if now one still listens to the Communist zone, one will be a criminal for generations. Also, there is Geneva Convention on the Treatment of Prisoners of War, which has been acknowledged and signed by the Communist regime in 1952. This convention stipulates that one cannot insult the prisoners of war, like tell them to lie on the ground, and should provide them with water and food. So if our uprising military or people are captured by the Communist military or police, this international convention should protect our prisoners of war.
余下部分见回复。
The rest see the reply.
|
|
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2014-7-18 08:40:21
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡